Not so good after all

New research challenges the perception of Walmart as an economic benefit to communities, showing that its presence may leave them poorer. Two studies reveal that Walmart’s low prices come at the cost of reduced wages, increased po^^^^y, and higher unemployment. Over a decade, communities with Walmart Supercenters experienced a 6% decline in household income, disproportionately affecting low-income and less-educated workers. Walmart’s practices, such as undercutting local businesses and pressuring suppliers, contribute to its dominance but hurt local economies. Workers face “monopsony power,” where Walmart suppresses wages due to limited job alternatives, and suppliers are forced to lower prices or cut costs, perpetuating a cycle of economic strain. Despite saving consumers money, the savings don’t compensate for the broader economic losses. This research questions the consumer-welfare standard used in antitrust policy since the 1970s, which prioritizes low prices over other economic impacts. The Biden administration aimed to address these concerns by considering effects on workers in antitrust enforcement, but it remains uncertain whether future administrations will continue this approach. Ultimately, Walmart’s example highlights the hidden costs of prioritizing low prices above broader economic well-being. Source: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/12/walmart-prices-po^^^^y-economy/681122/